Logo

Welcome to Natural Parenting

Login or Signup to meet new friends, find out what's going on, and connect with others on the site.


Sign Up Now

Registering for this site is easy. Just fill in the fields on the registration page and we'll get a new account set up for you in no time.

Forgot Your Password?

A new password will be e-mailed to you.

Member Login

Carbon Footprint of Formula Feeding


my son has decided to become a stockholder of ...

Image via Wikipedia

Making cow’s milk formula for all the young babies in India would need an additional 114 million lactating cows. And that’s just India….

I love the fact that someone has worked this out. It’s such a different angle to look at the breastfeeding/bottle feeding question. After 6 months I used infant formula with all three of my children, but I’d never thought about formula from this point of view.

I have tried to rework their maths, and got roughly as far as working out that about 28 million babies are born each year in India, but then got stuck as we have no idea how many cows it takes to feed one baby.

However, whether or not this number is correct, it’s probably in the right ball park.

I then wonder where would all these cows live, how much land would 114 million cows need? Who would look after them all? How much water would they drink, grass would they eat, and methane gas would they release into the atmosphere?

A quick scout round Google suggests that for every two dairy cows you need a hectare of grazing land, so that would be 570,000 km2 for this herd of cows – an equivalent of 17% of India’s surface, or an area the size of France or Kenya. I suppose battery cows would take less space, but this gives us a rough idea of what would be involved.

If all women in the world decided to bottle rather than breastfeed then an area the size of Australia would have to be completely taken over by lactating cows to provide infant formula for all the newborns of the world.

Whereas mothers are already living on the land that they live on, and producing milk that is perfect for their babies at a cheaper price than infant formula. Lactating mothers seem to be the answer, not lactating cows.

Infant formula is one of those Western conveniences – like cars, electricity, flushing toilets – where the environmental impact would be enormous if everyone around the world used them.

 

* * *

Sources:
Jelliffe and Jelliffe (1978) Human Milk in the Modern World OUP : Oxford

Enhanced by Zemanta


Related posts:

Eco Friendly and Stylish Diaper Bags
Are Organic Baby Clothes Necessary?
Shocking Baby Throwing Video
Help in Choosing a Baby Carrier

Discussion

4 Responses to “Carbon Footprint of Formula Feeding”

  1. That’s an interesting way to look at it! And you’re dead right. It is a typically Western convenience-obsessed way of doing things.

    Posted by Lindsey | January 2, 2012, 7:27 pm
  2. It’s so strange – it seems like there is so much pressure to get kids on formula. My son’s pediatrician actually advised me to ‘supplement’ with formula when he was only 1 or 2 months old. Later on I found out that that was terrible advice, and opened him up to all kinds of health issues… (Maddening since there was no actual problem – she just felt that formula was better for kids than breast milk). Anyhow, I’ve been fascinated by this issue ever since. Thank you for your post!

    Posted by mom and baby paintings | April 5, 2012, 12:28 am
  3. I use a simple expression to describe it, “Cow’s milk is perfect for baby cows, not for our baby ;-)

    Posted by Obat kanker | May 5, 2012, 6:24 am

Post a Comment

Categories

Follow Us Around the Web

Follow Me on Pinterest
Betterra Giveaways

Parenting Home Page

Natural Pregnancy Home Page